Again, if you use Apache as a web server and have mod_proxy enabled, you can do this with a simple. htaccessĪnother opportunity for hiding different feed locations from your users is to use a proxy. Most SEO experts will recommend doing permanent redirects (HTTP 301) instead. Even worse, doing temporary redirects often leads to problems with search engines that crawl your site and won't follow those redirects. The browsers we tested won't pass the original URL to the feed readers. In practice, it turns out that this doesn't work with most of the browsers / feed readers out there. htaccess example doing a temporary redirect to a remote service like Feedblitz could look like so: RewriteEngine On The feed reader could then use the original URL to subscribe (e.g " ") and only resolve the redirect target to fetch data (e.g. In theory, a browser would not resolve the redirect target and instead directly hand over the original URL to a feed reader. There are some blog posts suggesting that you should do this using a temporary redirect (HTTP response status 302). Apache) to set up a simple redirect to the feed service URL. htaccess (.Don't)Ī very simple solution is to use the capabilites of your webserver (e.g. 4 Ways to Deliver a Feed HTTP-Redirect via. Actually there are some solutions out there that look promising and each of them has its pros and cons. Instead of using the new feed URL provided by Feedblitz as a simple replacement, we also wanted to know if we could do better and prevent those issues in case of future migrations. Therefore, we had to promote the change of our feed URL and our subscribers had to manually re-subscribe to our new feed URL. Soon we realized that this would work for future subscribers but not for current ones.Īll our readers were subscribed to the feed URL provided by Feedburner (sth. When we decided to switch from Feedburner to Feedblitz, we thought about just swapping out the feed URL provided on our blog's site at first. Don't Present the Delivery Service to Your Subscribers Services like Feedburner or Feedblitz let you easily track who's interested in your content and help you retrieve statistics and measure the overall progress and success. However, if you're serious about your blog's success, then there might be some more requirements than just putting a simple feed URL somewhere on your website. Have you tried it already? What do you think about QuiteRSS? Let me know your thoughts in the comments below.From a simple technical perspective, there really might be no arguments against setting up a purely self-hosted feed for your blog. If you use QuiteRSS extensively or like the idea of this open source software, please consider making a donation to the project on the developer’s website. Overall, it is a great feed reader to have on Linux. You can also customize the fonts and colors to tweak the experience of your feed. The ability to switch themes (especially having a dark theme) is fantastic. If you face this issue, you might want to head on to their GitHub page to raise a new issue (unless they are already working on a reported issue). So, I have to re-launch every time I move from it. It does appear in the system tray, but I do want it to stay active unless I manually minimize it or close it. For some reason, whenever I minimize the application or switch the workspace, the application closes automatically. I find the ability to add labels quite useful to be able to filter out the stories I’ve read and enjoyed. You do not get a rich formatting for the RSS feed you follow but it is good enough for readable experience. It is a simple feed reader with a clean user experience.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |